What dull opacities of intellect
His paragraphs extend in bleak effect!
@ 2009-01-15 – 04:27:28
What dull opacities of intellect
His paragraphs extend in bleak effect!
@ 2009-01-15 – 04:25:48
Depriving Aphrodite of respect,
He gauged her by his lawless intellect.
@ 2009-01-15 – 04:24:08
Unbeautifying habitation, no
Concern for happiness Foucault would show.
@ 2009-01-15 – 04:22:18
1
Disanimately dense, Foucault no thin
Opacities enlarged on, deep therein.
2
Unbeautifying Venus, never fair
In human congress, he would grace forbear.
3
Disanimately muddled with intense
Opacities of tenuous thought, he’d books commence.
4
Unbeautifying Venus morbidly,
The deadest likelihood his mind would be.
@ 2009-01-11 – 21:22:01
The professorial diffidence in plain
Avowals, made in plays, grows more inane.
Dramatic voices disaccord with views
Of cowards, whose appeasements are the news.
Plainly veracious, in express concern
Enlivened, are the voices I’d discern.
@ 2009-01-11 – 20:23:16
The weakest professorial voices would
Prefer that Shakespeare be misunderstood.
@ 2009-01-11 – 20:20:16
The weakest voices are in colleges
Revered where virile genius vanishes.
@ 2009-01-11 – 04:25:03
1
Their prose disables comprehension, dulls
Cognition and distinguishment annuls .
2
Not food but irremedial fraud with no
Comestible benevolence comes of Foucault.
3
Their prose inhibits penetration, should
Our neurons seek coherent likelihood.
4
No philosophic sustenance the fraud
Administers which has professors awed.
@ 2009-01-10 – 14:05:52
Too ugly for digestion is the mind
Of Paul de Man inordinately blind.
Digesting Derrida no sustenance
Provides but speculative hunger scants.
Too ugly for digestion are Foucault’s
Depraved intents that proved destructive faults.
Assimilating ugliness, more sick
Of Derrida you’ll grow, in thought not quick.
The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.